words suicide is immoral. Similarly, in other situations, we can make generalizations which are just that: an action that will generally produce certain results. Kants views are that all moral choices are equal as long as the intention is good. Both Kant and Mill agree that if you cannot swim and your attempt to save the child would end in increased suffering, then you are morally obligated to not jump into the water. On a personal level, I have often believed that the consequences are less important than the motive behind the action when it comes to morality. In The Metaphysics of Morals, Kants definition of a crime is any act that violates the public law (Kant 105) and the right to punish is the right a ruler has against a subject to inflict pain upon him because of his having committed. Simply put, by doing the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people, you are in turn also creating the greatest amount of happiness through your good actions (Lecture, 1/30 2/01). Kant, Immanuel, and Mary. Attention shifts from the victims life to that of the murderer.
For the most part, simply staying alive has no moral value, except in the case of the individual who wants to die but continues to live without enjoying. Any action under Kants theory is tested as a general rule for the public, and if the consequences are undesirable, then the general rule is rejected. Strong Essays 2141 words (6.1 pages) - Immanuel Kant's Theory Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) discussed many ethical systems and reasonings some were based on a belief that the reason is the final authority for morality. Kant explained that part of a person's duty is to ensure the continuation of one's life.
Atheism believing doubt essay honest in society, Me essay about myself,
He argues that the amount of suffering and happiness is what denotes the morality of an how to write a research paper in business action and thus strongly believes the consequences of an action are what decide its morality. I shall assume I am not alone in my beliefs and thus find it interesting that two seemingly somewhat contradictory theories both have their place within an individual and his or her actions. If a child was drowning and you successfully saved, you're actions would be considered moral because you prevented suffering. This maxim, however, should not just be applicable to you in the situation. (Kant 31) In other words, people should act only in such a way that their actions can become a law that can be applied universally (to everyone). All he shows is that the consequences of their universal adoption would be such as no one would choose to incur. There is nothing higher than reason." -Immanuel Kant "Ask yourself why you're happy and you will cease to." - John Stuart Mill.